What is the implication of being left to settle the restaurant bill?

The chosen answer highlights the specific implication that one is expected to take responsibility for covering the costs of the restaurant bill. The phrase "left to foot the restaurant bill" directly suggests that the individual is left with no choice but to pay for the expenses incurred, typically indicating that others may have been present but did not contribute.

This concept of “footing the bill” is commonly understood as taking on the financial burden for a group or situation. In this context, it implies that the speaker ended up shouldering the financial responsibility, either through a lack of contributions from others or by default.

In contrast, the other choices do not convey the same level of responsibility. For instance, saying one was "left to discuss the restaurant bill" does not imply any financial responsibility, only that a conversation about the bill was necessary. Similarly, mentioning being "told to clear the restaurant bill" or "required to pay the restaurant bill" suggests directives but lacks the nuance of being left in a situation where one feels compelled to take on the expense without support from others. The selected answer encompasses the broader implication of being left solely responsible for an expense, which captures the intended meaning effectively.