What does the use of "reputed" imply about the person's background?

The term "reputed" suggests that there is a general belief or perception about the person in question. It indicates that many people hold that view, even if it may not be backed by undeniable proof or official documentation. Therefore, "widely believed" aptly captures this essence, as it conveys that the person's reputation is established in the minds of the public without necessarily being formally confirmed.

In contrast, "well-documented" implies that there is substantial evidence or records supporting the person's background, which does not align with the more subjective nature of "reputed." "Certainly proven" suggests a level of certainty and verification that is not inherent in the term being discussed, as "reputed" does not guarantee that the beliefs about the person are accurate or confirmed. Lastly, "acclaimed by few" indicates a limited recognition rather than a broad perception, which does not fit with the implication that there is a wide belief surrounding the person's reputation.